[google-translator]

Current World Rankings

Based on matches up to 1st July 2020
RankingFlagTeamPlayedWeightedPointsRating
1flag1Australia39265,329205
2flag2New Zealand50336,022182
3flag3England53366,299175
4flag4Jamaica28203,496175
5flag5South Africa47355,252150
6flag6Malawi36273,408126
7ugandaUganda32232,819123
8flag10Scotland22151,707114
9flag8Wales23161,710107
10bfb04946b73242949dc4a00a412b2390Trinidad & Tobago19151,504100
11northern-ireland Northern Ireland24181,71095
12zimbabweZimbabwe31232,10491
13photo_0163261340udvujoBarbados23151,24183
14Cook Islands19141,13181
15zambiaZambia23151,08772
16samoaSamoa18141,01172
17fijiFiji30191,33270
18sri-lankaSri Lanka141165459
19sri-lankaTonga9633656
20St Lucia11632053
21St Vincent & Grenadines191049149
22grenadaGrenada241362848
23namibiaNamibia231569947
24irelandIsle of Man9522445
25malaysiaMalaysia221354142
26Cayman Islands171249541
27botswanaBotswana231558839
28irelandIreland281974239
29canadaCanada161035435
30singapore-flagSingapore402983529
31Antigua & Barbuda141027327
32gibraltar Gibraltar14718727
33hong-kongHong Kong201023223
34papuaPapua New Guinea151225121
35St Kitts & Nevis669716
36USA1077911
37UAE95377
38Dominica84297
39Kenya129283
40Lesotho6600
41israelIsrael9500
42Thailand12800
43st-maarten-small-imageSt Maarten131000
44Argentina7400

This rankings system was developed for the INF by statistician David Kendix.

The first list was published on 11 February 2008. The latest list has been updated on 1st July 2020 and includes matches up to this date. The ranking list relates to senior teams of member countries that are playing regular international test matches. To find out more about how the system works read below and click here for Frequently Asked Questions.

A rating is a measure of the average performance of a team over a series of matches. Each team earns a certain number of points from each international match. Their rating is the total number of points earned divided by the number of matches played. The team with the highest rating is ranked first in the world. The next highest rating is ranked second and so on.

Weighting Matches played a long time ago are a poorer guide to current form than more recent results. Therefore past results are weighted, giving a lower weighting to earlier results. For the purposes of this list, matches played since July 2019 currently have a full weighting (100%). Matches played in the two previous years (July 2017-June 2019) have a weighting of 50%. Earlier matches are not directly included in the ratings at all.

Each July, the oldest year of results will drop out of the ratings and the weightings redistributed. This is the one annual occasion when the rankings list could alter other than through a match being played.

Points:

The number of points earned by a team for any match depends on two factors. The result (won, tied or lost) and the opponent against whom the result was achieved. The higher an opponent’s rating the more points are earned for beating them.

If a team wins a match they will earn 50 points more than their opponent’s rating.  But if they lose, they will earn 50 points less than their opponent’s rating. Worked numerical examples appear in the Frequently Asked Questions.

Rating Period:

It is not meaningful for a team to claim a world ranking if they have only played a small number of matches. As soon as a team has played eight International test matches over the rating period then they will have earned an official world ranking. If a team has played fewer than eight matches, they will still have a rating, but without a corresponding ranking. To have a ranking the team must have played at least 2 games against a rated team.

The following teams currently have a rating in the system and could become ranked once they have played 6 matches:

  • Maldives
  • Vanuatu
  • India
  • Pakistan
  • Chinese Taipei

The INF World Rankings were reviewed at the INF Board Meeting in June 2012, with David Kendix, Statistician, who was retained by the INF to develop the ranking methodology in 2007.

Following a detailed discussion the Board was satisfied that we have a robust and reliable rankings system that presents a true reflection of the quality and standing of the performances of international teams and that this system can be used with confidence for qualification purposes.

NEWSLETTER Keep up to date with the latest news and events from INF.