fbpx
[google-translator]

Current World Rankings

Based on matches up to 23rd October 2016
RankingFlagTeamPlayedWeightedPointsRating
1flag1Australia30193,698195
2flag2New Zealand37244,553190
3flag3England40254,556182
4flag4Jamaica23152,638176
5flag5South Africa54385,975157
6ugandaUganda42313,951127
7Malawi39283,430123
8flag8Wales15111,321120
9flag10Scotland106703117
10bfb04946b73242949dc4a00a412b2390Trinidad & Tobago22131,298100
11northern-ireland Northern Ireland161092893
12photo_0163261340udvujoBarbados22151,30287
13zimbabweZimbabwe37252,15286
14Cook Islands9540882
15fijiFiji10535170
16samoaSamoa10533968
17zambiaZambia29211,37666
18sri-lankaSri Lanka14744263
19grenadaGrenada16847760
20St Vincent & Grenadines201376058
21St Lucia12944950
22namibiaNamibia35271,27147
23irelandIsle of Man171564343
24malaysiaMalaysia13729843
25UAE9727539
26Cayman Islands14727039
27botswanaBotswana241653433
28irelandIreland181136633
29canadaCanada13723233
30Antigua & Barbuda241753431
31singapore-flagSingapore261337229
32hong-kongHong Kong10514329
33gibraltar Gibraltar191423617
34USA1055511
35papuaPapua New Guinea955411
36Dominica139597
37Kenya25191005
38 width=Tanzania 8800
38Lesotho6300
38St Kitts & Nevis11800
38Thailand9500
38st-maarten-small-imageSt Maarten181200
38Argentina7400

This rankings system was developed for the INF by statistician David Kendix.

The first list was published on 11 February 2008. The latest list has been updated on 24th November 2016 and includes matches up to 23rd October 2016. The ranking list relates to senior teams of member countries that are playing regular international test matches. To find out more about how the system works read below and click here for Frequently Asked Questions.

A rating is a measure of the average performance of a team over a series of matches. Each team earns a certain number of points from each international match. Their rating is the total number of points earned divided by the number of matches played. The team with the highest rating is ranked first in the world. The next highest rating is ranked second and so on.

Weighting Matches played a long time ago are a poorer guide to current form than more recent results. Therefore past results are weighted, giving a lower weighting to earlier results. For the purposes of this list, matches played since July 2015 currently have a full weighting (100%). Matches played in the two previous years (July 2013-June 2015) have a weighting of 50%. Earlier matches are not directly included in the ratings at all.

Each July, the oldest year of results will drop out of the ratings and the weightings redistributed. This is the one annual occasion when the rankings list could alter other than through a match being played.

Points:

The number of points earned by a team for any match depends on two factors. The result (won, tied or lost) and the opponent against whom the result was achieved. The higher an opponent’s rating the more points are earned for beating them.

If a team wins a match they will earn 50 points more than their opponent’s rating.  But if they lose, they will earn 50 points less than their opponent’s rating. Worked numerical examples appear in the Frequently Asked Questions.

Rating Period:

It is not meaningful for a team to claim a world ranking if they have only played a small number of matches. As soon as a team has played eight International test matches over the rating period then they will have earned an official world ranking. If a team has played fewer than eight matches, they will still have a rating, but without a corresponding ranking.  To have a ranking the team must have played at least 2 games against a rated team.

The following teams currently have a rating in the system and could become ranked once they have played 8 matches:

  • Bermuda
  • Cayman Islands
  • India
  • Maldives
  • Namibia
  • St Maarten
  • Vanuatu
  • St Kitts & Nevis
  • Israel
  • Tonga

The INF World Rankings were reviewed at the INF Board Meeting in June 2012, with David Kendix, Statistician, who was retained by the INF to develop the ranking methodology in 2007.

Following a detailed discussion the Board was satisfied that we have a robust and reliable rankings system that presents a true reflection of the quality and standing of the performances of international teams and that this system can be used with confidence for qualification purposes.

NEWSLETTER Keep up to date with the latest news and events from INF.